The Broward County Police Benevolent Association

 

 

Welcome to
The Broward County
Police Benevolent Association

NEWS

Police to City Manager: Take Action or Resign


Hallandale Beach Police Officers and their supporters will hold a protest rally on Tuesday, June 16th at 10:00 a.m. in front of the Hallandale Beach City Hall to demand action by the City Manager on their concerns or his resignation for failing to support law enforcement in the city.


“The police are undermanned and under siege in Hallandale Beach,” said Broward County PBA President Patrick Hanrahan. “We hold the City Manager failing to hire enough officers and for neglecting the ones we have.”


The PBA will unveil a public information campaign reaching out to Hallandale City residents to contact their elected officials on behalf of the police.


Representatives of the Florida and Broward County Police Benevolent
Associations will be in attendance.

Click here to read the press release

 


 

PBA Brings Stop to CRB Investigations

On May 29, 2009 the Fifth District Court of Appeal brought an end to investigations of alleged police misconduct by the Orange County Citizens Review Board finding that such investigations were unconstitutional and in direct conflict with the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights.  The decision, Demings v. Orange County Citizens Review Board, was the result of a lawsuit filed by the Florida PBA on behalf of an Orange County deputy sheriff who was subpoenaed to testify before the review board which was investigating him, even though he had been already been cleared of any misconduct charges by the Sheriff’s Office.

As many of you know, the creation of local citizen review boards is an increasingly popular “political” solution to allegations of police misconduct.  More and more local governments (and local politicians) view these boards as a way to avoid criticism of the manner in a local law enforcement agency handles its internal affairs investigations, specifically allegations of excessive force or misuse of police authority.  Obviously, the benefit to the politicians is the avoidance of the wrath of voters and other special interest groups by establishing the boards to do a “fair and objective” investigation.

This was just the situation in the Demings case in which the review board subpoenaed an Orange County deputy sheriff to testify before it.  When the deputy refused to honor the subpoena based upon the advice of the PBA, a lawsuit was filed to enforce the subpoena.  The deputy, through the PBA, responded claiming the investigative powers of the board were unconstitutional because they were in conflict with the LEO Bill of Rights.  The Sheriff’s Office, to its credit, supported the deputy, joining in the lawsuit and claiming that, in addition to the conflict with the bill of rights, the board’s powers were in conflict with the Sheriff’s authority as a constitutional officer.

The PBA and the sheriff lost the first legal battle before the circuit court, but the result from the district court was far better.  The district court found that language of the LEO Bill of Rights made it clear that, except for limited circumstances, the investigative procedures outlined in the statute were the exclusive procedure for investigating officer misconduct.  The court held that the citizens review board’s investigative authority conflicted not only with the LEO Bill of Rights, but also with the independence of the Sheriff.  It concluded the investigative authority granted to the board is unconstitutional and void. 

While the Florida PBA is hopeful that the litigation on this issue will end, in all likelihood this is just the second stage of the litigation with the next stop being the Florida Supreme Court.  In the meantime, the decision will provide valuable ammunition for opponents of the citizen review board process.  As explained by Florida PBA President John Rivera:  “Our members have always been opposed to the concept of these boards manned by civilians who know little, if anything, about police work.  The PBA felt action was necessary to stop them, so we took that action.  That is why we are the PBA.”

A special thanks goes out to Stewart Cohen, counsel for the Central Florida PBA, and Hal Johnson, General Counsel for the Florida PBA, for their hard work on this case.  Also, another thank you goes out to Sheriff Demings and his attorney, Eric Dunlap, for continuing the fight alongside the PBA in this legal battle.

 


 

Democratic commissioners to battle with Republican sheriff today
Here's a twist on political stereotypes: Broward's Democratic county commission is calling for major budget cuts at the Broward Sheriff's Office. Republican Sheriff Al Lamberti has proposed a budget that is more than $50 million above what the Democrats want to give him. The more Lamberti cuts, the less commissioners have to cut from their own budget.


The first public showdown between Lamberti and commissioners is set for today at 1 p.m. at County Hall. Much is at stake: Lamberti has already sent layoff notices to 177 workers and told judges that he is getting rid of drug treatment and other programs in the jail as of Aug. 1.


This year's budget battle could be the first of many: County Auditor Evan Lukic recently released a report that says BSO is undercharging cities by $14.4 million for next year. And labor agreements show that contract costs will continue to escalate faster than revenues, he wrote.


Ultimately, Lamberti could become the first constitutional officer in Florida to appeal his budget to the Cabinet. Though Lamberti insists he isn't a politician and that his Republican affiliation is irrelevant, it could help: three of the four Cabinet members are Republican and one is Gov. Charlie Crist who appointed Lamberti as sheriff in 2007.


Posted by Amy Sherman on May 19, 2009

 

Matt Puckett
Deputy Executive Director
Florida Police Benevolent Association


 

Parents Concerned Over BSO Budget Cuts Sheriff Expected To Ask For $6 Million Budget Raise

POSTED: Monday, May 18, 2009
UPDATED: 7:53 am EDT May 19, 2009


FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. -- Joan Martin and Sondie Snelson own homes in Broward. Their children attend public school there. And they said they have a lot to lose if the sheriff's office takes a financial beating.
"Of course I'm worried. It's bad out there," Martin told Local 10's Sasha Andrade.
Video


"I think it's ridiculous. I don't know what we're supposed to do," Snelson said.
The county asked Sheriff Al Lamberti to cut about 12 percent of his $700 million budget. On Tuesday, Lamberti is expected to make a proposal that doesn't even come close to that amount. In fact, he's asking for a $6 million raise in the budget.
"He cut a lot out last year and I know he's trying to do what he can," said Police Benevolent Association President Pat Hanrahan.


With the extra money, the sheriff would still have to eliminate about 260 positions, including dozens of school resource deputies.
"These are our kids. This is our school. We need every little bit of everything we can get," Snelson said.
"The crime gets worse every year, not better," Martin said.
The PBA agrees with parents.


"If you start cutting deputies off the street, you're going to see crime increase like it already has," Hanrahan said.
Most of the cuts in the proposal come from one of BSO's medium security jails and from some of the mental health facilities. The sheriff is also proposing 5-day furloughs for certain departments.
Supporters said it's all Lamberti can do to keep the budget lean and the county safe. But county commissioners said it's not enough. They are beiong asked to cut $160 million from their $3.7 billion budget. They said they need the sheriff to do more during the economic crisis.


BSO is still hoping enough federal stimulus money will come in time to save the jobs. No one knows when, or if, that will happen.


Copyright 2009 by Post-Newsweek Stations. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

 

Matt Puckett
Deputy Executive Director
Florida Police Benevolent Association


 

First-Time Homebuyers Have Several Options to Maximize New Tax Credit  

The Treasury Department encourages taxpayers to explore these options to maximize their credit and get their money back as fast as possible.
"said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. "For people who recently purchased a home or are considering buying in the next few months, there are several different ways that they can get this tax credit even if they've already filed their tax return."
First-time homebuyers represent a significant portion of existing single-family home sales. The expansion in the first-time homebuyer credit will make it easier for first-time homebuyers to enter the housing market this year.
Under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, qualifying taxpayers who purchase a home before Dec. 1 receive up to $8,000, or $4,000 for married individuals filing separately. People can claim the credit either on their 2008 tax returns due April 15 or on their 2009 tax returns next year.
The filing options to consider are:

  • File an extension - Taxpayers who haven't yet filed their 2008 returns but are buying a home soon can request a six-month extension to October 15.  This step would be faster than waiting until next year to claim it on the 2009 tax return.  Even with an extension, taxpayers could still file electronically, receiving their refund in as few as 10 days with direct deposit.
  • File now, amend later - Taxpayers due a sizable refund for their 2008 tax return but who also are considering buying a house in the next few months can file their return now and claim the credit later.  Taxpayers would file their 2008 tax forms as usual, then follow up with an amended return later this year to claim the homebuyer credit.
  • Amend the 2008 tax return - Taxpayers buying a home in the near future who have already filed their 2008 tax return can consider filing an amended tax return. The amended tax return will allow them to claim the homebuyer credit on the 2008 return without waiting until next year to claim it on the 2009 return.
  • Claim the credit in 2009 rather than 2008 - For some taxpayers, it may make more financial sense to wait and claim the homebuyer credit next year when they file the 2009 tax return rather than claiming it now on the 2008 tax return. This could benefit taxpayers who might qualify for a higher credit on the 2009 tax return. This could include people who have less income in 2009 than 2008 because of factors such as a job loss or drop in investment income.

The IRS reminds taxpayers the amount of the credit begins to phase out for taxpayers whose modified adjusted gross income is more than $75,000, or $150,000 for joint filers. Taxpayers can claim 10 percent of the purchase price up to $8,000, or $4,000 for married individuals filing separately.
IRS.gov provides more information, including guidance for people who bought their first homes in 2008. To learn more about the overall implementation of the Recovery Act, visit www.Recovery.gov.

Jackie Keller
Senior Relationship Stakeholder Tax Consultant 
Acting Area 2 Analyst
Internal Revenue Service

Page updated on June 30, 2009 5:37 PM

Terms of Use | Site Map |